Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 83685 - uml_net executable allows users to do bad things
Summary: uml_net executable allows users to do bad things
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel-utils
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-02-07 02:33 UTC by jonny robertson
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-07 18:18:31 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2003:056 normal SHIPPED_LIVE : Updated kernel-utils packages fix setuid vulnerability 2003-02-07 05:00:00 UTC

Description jonny robertson 2003-02-07 02:33:31 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22smp i686; en-US; m18)
M$-Free/Gecko/20010110 Netscape6/6.5

Description of problem:
The uml_net binary that installs as part of the kernel-utils package in redhat 8
is setuid root.  

It can be crashed with a negative version number (doesn't look exploitable to
me), and can be used by local (unpriveleged) users to up/down certain
interfaces, add and remove arp entries and routes, and put interfaces in and out
of promiscuous mode.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check eth0 is not in promisc mode
2. As a local user try 'uml_net 4 ethertap eth0 crap promisc'
3. Re-check step 1
    

Actual Results:  IF goes into promisc mode

Expected Results:  Permission denied?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2003-02-07 18:18:31 UTC
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-056.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.