Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 8073 - Missing gpg key
Summary: Missing gpg key
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: sharutils
Version: 6.1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Preston Brown
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-12-30 22:20 UTC by orders1
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-01-14 02:41:28 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description orders1 1999-12-30 22:20:13 UTC
sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1.i386.rpm is not signed by Redhat gpg key.
Don't know about other architectures.

Comment 1 cobbe 1999-12-31 16:55:59 UTC
The corresponding SRPM isn't signed either.

Comment 2 Aleksey Nogin 2000-01-03 21:04:59 UTC
Also, sharutils-4.2.1-1.5.2.i386.rpm isn't signed.

I noticed, that this problem (unsigned packages in updates) occurs quite often.
Do you think it would make sense to write a script that checks all the packages
submitted to updates for being properly signed?

Comment 3 berv01 2000-01-05 04:42:59 UTC
What I noticed was that the md5sum from the package (sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1) did
not match the one on the advisory web page, at least for the i386 and SRPMS. I
wonder what caused this...

Comment 4 Preston Brown 2000-01-14 02:41:59 UTC
this has been fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.