Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 80660 - gnumeric-1.0.9-6 won't start; won't build
Summary: gnumeric-1.0.9-6 won't start; won't build
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: python
Version: phoebe
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mihai Ibanescu
QA Contact: Brock Organ
Depends On:
Blocks: 79578
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2002-12-29 16:33 UTC by sean
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-02-04 00:20:19 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description sean 2002-12-29 16:33:02 UTC
Description of problem:
gnumeric won't start. strace shows it looking for the python japanese files, and
then dying:

fstat64(9, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=158, ...}) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0

It won't build:
Processing files: gnumeric-devel-1.0.9-6
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: gnumeric = 1.0.9
Processing files: gnumeric-debuginfo-1.0.9-6
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
RPM build errors:
    File not found:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 Mihai Ibanescu 2003-01-03 13:35:26 UTC
While gnumeric not starting may be a python bug, gnumeric not rebuilding isn't.
seandarcy: would you mind posting a different bug for the 'not building' part?
Having two bugs reported in the same bug report is generally difficult to track.
I could create the new bug entry myself, but I don't know how to reproduce it
(haven't tried it either), and you probably want to see the evolution of the
bug. Sorry for putting you to more work, I just think this way both the
developer(s) and the person submitting the bug will benefit.

Comment 2 Mihai Ibanescu 2003-02-04 00:20:19 UTC
I cannot reproduce this with the latest code. Closing. Feel free to reopen it if
you notice it again.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.