Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 727672 - Review Request: metasploit-4.0 - The Metasploit Framework
Summary: Review Request: metasploit-4.0 - The Metasploit Framework
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2011-08-02 20:08 UTC by Keiran Smith
Modified: 2015-12-11 16:08 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2015-12-11 16:08:16 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Keiran Smith 2011-08-02 20:08:41 UTC
Spec URL:

The Metasploit Framework is a development platform for creating security tools and exploits. The framework is used by network security professionals to perform penetration tests, system administrators to verify patch installations, product vendors to perform regression testing, and security researchers world-wide. The framework is written in the Ruby programming language and includes components written in C and assembler.

rpmlint metasploit-4.0-1.src.rpm
metasploit.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Metasploit
metasploit.src: W: strange-permission metasploit.spec 0600L
metasploit.src: W: no-%build-section
metasploit.src: W: file-size-mismatch framework-4.0.0.tar.bz2 = 81297115, = 79515768
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Package was built from the SVN Version on Metasploit-4.0 Release day

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2011-08-21 21:08:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Spec URL:

This gives a "Sorry, not found!"

Comment 2 Keiran Smith 2011-08-21 22:32:42 UTC
Sorry about that I recently moved Sever.

Updated Links :

Spec URL:

Comment 3 Juan Orti Alcaine 2011-11-30 09:27:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sorry about that I recently moved Sever.
> Updated Links :
> Spec URL:

I get Forbidden at that URL

Comment 4 Scott Tsai 2012-01-15 20:13:24 UTC
I'm getting HTTP 404 from the SPEC file link.

Comment 5 Michael S. 2012-03-24 07:06:15 UTC
Still 404, so I am marking the review as "NotReady", remove it from WhiteBoard once the url is no longer 404 or forbidden.

Comment 6 James Hogarth 2015-12-04 02:57:42 UTC
Keiran are you intending to try and progress this?

It had been a long time since the previous comments.

As per policy of there is no response within a week this bug will be closed.

Comment 7 James Hogarth 2015-12-11 16:08:16 UTC
It's been over a week with no response from the requestor to the NeedsInfo flag.

Closing as per policy.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.