Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 66925 - Install Crash - cannot install
Summary: Install Crash - cannot install
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 66181
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Fulbright
QA Contact: Brock Organ
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2002-06-18 19:21 UTC by Need Real Name
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:43 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-06-18 23:37:27 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Installer asked me to save this to disk (deleted)
2002-06-18 19:22 UTC, Need Real Name
no flags Details

Description Need Real Name 2002-06-18 19:21:44 UTC
Description of Problem:
Get a crash during the install process. unrecoverable. Reproduced twice.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 7.3

How Reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run the install
2. When it's copying files, wait
3. Boom.

Actual Results:

Expected Results:
goes on to completion

Additional Information:
Celeron 366, logitech wheelmouse, logitech internet keyboard, 128mbram, 4.1 
primary HD, floppy, internal zip drive, smc ethernet card.

Comment 1 Need Real Name 2002-06-18 19:22:29 UTC
Created attachment 61451 [details]
Installer asked me to save this to disk

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2002-06-18 23:37:21 UTC
Update:  Forgot to mention the voodoo3 2000 (PCI). Ran the media check on the 
cd I had burned, was all good. Ran the install low-res, is past the point 
where it had crashed before (it had been crapping out at the progress bar that 
popped up prior to installing the packages). And last but not least, this time 
I also double (and triple) checked that the partitioning was set up by the 
install software - it didn't seem to have made the same # of partitions (3) 
before. So this <i>may</i> have been my fault (aren't all bugs the users 
fault) in that the partitioning may have been wrong and not caught by the 
install program. and yes, this is my first linux install; since I can get past 
afterall, I'm resetting priority lower (I think).

Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2002-06-20 15:03:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 66181 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.