Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 595048 - [abrt] crash in brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/brasero was ki...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 552061
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: brasero
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavier Lamien
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:8c4bf4a0cddedfc994a2ac5f80a...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-05-23 05:18 UTC by Serg Merkelov
Modified: 2010-05-25 09:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:23:38 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (deleted)
2010-05-23 05:18 UTC, Serg Merkelov
no flags Details

Description Serg Merkelov 2010-05-23 05:18:32 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: brasero
component: brasero
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/brasero
global_uuid: 8c4bf4a0cddedfc994a2ac5f80af5601e1c2f14d
package: brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
1. Create data project.
2. Add files.
3. Add to project video file larger than 2gb.
4. Click "add file" on warning message.
4. Try to delete some files from project.

Comment 1 Serg Merkelov 2010-05-23 05:18:37 UTC
Created attachment 415917 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:23:38 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 552061 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:23:38 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #552061.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.