Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 592817 - a feature request
Summary: a feature request
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: labrea
Version: 12
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: Feature, request (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-17 05:01 UTC by robert fairb
Modified: 2010-08-12 05:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-12 05:36:50 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description robert fairb 2010-05-17 05:01:08 UTC
Description of problem:
ive been using labrea for a few months and I've noticed a significant improvement in network security and i really think that alot more people would use it if it had a nicer gui. 
i also think that it could be integrated with the gui for the fedora firewall then we could disable it or reconfigure it for different network set-ups as needed, or event just have it turned off by default, maybey give it a checkbox hat says use tarpiting  . 

so my piont is im requesting that fedora use labrea as a default package with a simple gui <so i guess thats really two features >

i think when a hacker realizes you use fedora linux and that it has one or more tarpits they'll probably leave you alone 

please fell free  to email if possible me if you have a question about the neat idea

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2010-05-17 14:50:59 UTC
Reassigning to proper component.

Comment 2 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2010-08-12 05:31:48 UTC
*** Bug 592820 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2010-08-12 05:36:50 UTC
This is more of a upstream request, involving multiple parties.
I am going to get this upstream and see if they want to do it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.