Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 5880 - RPM 3.0.2-5.x incorrectly identifies required libraries
Summary: RPM 3.0.2-5.x incorrectly identifies required libraries
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: pam_ldap
Version: 5.2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Johnson
QA Contact:
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 1999-10-12 15:41 UTC by heath
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-01-13 22:40:07 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description heath 1999-10-12 15:41:14 UTC
When building a new RPM (via rpm -bb), everything builds
correctly, but rpm incorrectly identifies a "library" as
being required.  The package in question is pam-ldap.  There
is a linker directive (-fPIC) that is being picked up by RPM
as being a required library.  This means that the resultant
rpm complains about a missing dependency when the dependency
shouldn't be there in the first place.

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-10-12 17:31:59 UTC
Can you send a pointer to the package and/or supply the spec file?
Thanks ...

Comment 2 heath 1999-10-12 20:24:59 UTC
The package was pam_ldap-38-mz1.src.rpm.  In this package, there is a
patch for Makefile.linux that makes the following change:

-LD_FLAGS = -x --shared -rpath $(LDAP_LIB_DIR) -lcrypt -lnsl -lpam
-lnsl -lpthread -lresolv
+LD_FLAGS = -x -shared -rpath $(LDAP_LIB_DIR) -fPIC -lcrypt -lnsl
-lpam -lnsl -lpthread -lresolv

When doing an rpm -bb <specfile>, the following are noted near the

Finding provides...
Finding requires...
Requires: PIC
Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pam_ldap-38-mz1.i386.rpm

Since PIC isn't a package or file, it's causes failed dependencies
when you try to install the package.  --nodeps works around it, but I
hate to --nodeps any installation unless I'm 100% sure that I have
what it's looking for.


Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 1999-12-15 18:04:59 UTC
I don't think this is an rpm problem, but rather a mis-linking in the pam_ldap
package (or possibly in egcs command line argument processing). Rpm simply
runs objdump on libraries and massages the output to auto-generate requirements.

Comment 4 Preston Brown 2000-01-13 22:40:59 UTC
the latest nss_ldap/pam_ldap I have built here do not have any problem with the
-fPIC flag.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.