Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 500003 - Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers
Summary: Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susi Lehtola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2009-05-10 02:23 UTC by Konstantin Ryabitsev
Modified: 2009-08-19 03:00 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-08-19 02:48:12 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-05-10 02:23:35 UTC
Spec URL:
TextRoom and all other similar editors share one goal: to get you writing 
right away by providing distraction free environment to your liking, as well 
as familiar set of keyboard shortcuts to control its behavior. If you don't 
feel comfortable already with your editor of choice, you may find it useful.

Comment 1 Susi Lehtola 2009-05-10 11:02:46 UTC
- Install also the other .desktop file that adds the mime type. Remember to add updating of desktop cache as per


rpmlint output:
textroom.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.3 ['0.5.3-1.fc10', '0.5.3-1']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

- You're missing the release -1 from the changelog.

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Add CHANGELOG and README to %doc.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A

MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. NEEDSFIX
- Install also the other .desktop file.

MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

Comment 2 Susi Lehtola 2009-06-08 19:00:27 UTC

Comment 3 Susi Lehtola 2009-07-05 10:37:44 UTC
ping again?

Comment 4 Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-05 17:42:48 UTC
Yeah, I'll take care of it shortly. I just need to rewrite the mime files to actually work with KDE 4 (the existing ones are obsolete).

Comment 5 Susi Lehtola 2009-07-22 12:36:54 UTC
ping Konstantin

Comment 6 Susi Lehtola 2009-08-16 09:11:45 UTC
ping again

Comment 7 Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-08-19 02:48:12 UTC
I've decided against maintaining this package.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.