Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 454609 - [kn_IN] Collation order is needed for kannada
Summary: [kn_IN] Collation order is needed for kannada
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: glibc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pravin Satpute
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-07-09 11:00 UTC by Shankar Prasad
Modified: 2016-11-24 12:20 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 2.8.90-9
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-20 09:01:52 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
It will add kannada collation support in glibc (deleted)
2008-07-11 12:14 UTC, Pravin Satpute
no flags Details | Diff

Description Shankar Prasad 2008-07-09 11:00:16 UTC
Description of problem: In nautilus, Kannada characters are not sorting in
proper order


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc-2.7.90-7


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Log in Kn locale.
2.Create a few files with kannada scripts and save it with .txt extension.
3.Open the those files in Nautilus and see the sorting order  

Actual results: Sorting Order is not proper


Expected results: It should be in same order as kannada dictionary uses


Additional info:

Comment 1 Pravin Satpute 2008-07-09 11:08:46 UTC
working on that..
i will submit patch soon

Comment 2 Pravin Satpute 2008-07-11 12:14:20 UTC
Created attachment 311566 [details]
It will add kannada collation support in glibc

I have used unicode 5.1 for this..
used defualt sort order given by unicode, wherever sorting order is not clear

Comment 3 Ulrich Drepper 2008-07-11 17:07:05 UTC
The patch wasn't correctly formed (<xxxx) instead of <Uxxxx> in a few places). 
You reallt should test patches.

I've corrected the mistakes and checked in the patch upstream.

Comment 4 Pravin Satpute 2008-07-14 04:47:51 UTC
oops, 
it was giving me some errors for these code point...
'./locales/iso14651_t1_common:830: symbol `0CD5' not in repertoire map'
'./locales/iso14651_t1_common:831: symbol `0CC6' not in charmap'
my eyes really cant recognized actual problem...(silly mistake)
It will be better to ask such problems to you before putting patch
sorry for that..
i will ask doubts to you next time..

thanks for correcting patch and applying to upstream..

Comment 5 Ulrich Drepper 2008-07-20 09:01:52 UTC
The collcation data should be in 2.8.90-9.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.