Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 27660 - RFE: add memtest86
Summary: RFE: add memtest86
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer
Version: 7.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeremy Katz
QA Contact: Brock Organ
: 80566 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2001-02-14 21:50 UTC by Matthew Miller
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:31 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-03-02 18:09:39 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Matthew Miller 2001-02-14 21:50:58 UTC
Memtest86 is a very nice x86 RAM tester written by Chris Brady of SGI. See for more information. Since
bad RAM is extremely common on cheap PC hardware, this is quite useful to
have around.

The program runs stand-alone -- it's launched from LILO -- so that it can
get low-level access to test more RAM.

I've created an RPM at -- feel free to
use this as a base. It would also be good to change the bit of the
installer that writes the initial lilo.conf.

Comment 1 Daniel Roesen 2001-02-15 12:49:44 UTC
Strongly seconded. We are not the only place where installing memtest86 in all
our servers LILO config is a standard procedure.

BTW, I think that would also serve RH Support when bugs are reported which smell
like RAM/bus problems. "Please enter 'memtest' on the LILO prompt and let it run
for a few hours to see if there are problems in this area"...

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2001-02-27 23:56:40 UTC
Will consider for next release cycle.

Comment 3 Andrew Bartlett 2001-08-18 03:11:11 UTC
Did this get considered?  I can't see it in rawhide.

Comment 4 Matt Wilson 2001-09-17 19:32:36 UTC
considered, yes - but it will take some time to get it in place.

Comment 5 Matthew Miller 2001-09-17 19:35:15 UTC
I've got a newer src RPM at , by the way.
However, 2.7 seems to have a problem where it pops up an empty black box when it
starts, which is sort of confusing. (Not just my binaries, but the precompiled
one, on any machine I've tried it on.)

Comment 6 Peter Bowen 2002-07-21 20:54:24 UTC
*** Bug 69346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Matthew Miller 2002-07-30 19:36:47 UTC
FWIW, the RPM at

is now updated to version 3.0, and includes a few quick scripts to run grubby.

Comment 8 Matthew Miller 2002-07-30 19:38:11 UTC
Oh, and the new version no longer has the black-box bug.

Comment 9 Michael Fulbright 2003-01-02 22:15:08 UTC
*** Bug 80566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Neal Pollack 2003-02-10 16:20:59 UTC
It is suggested that this be added to the boot/install cd
as an initial option, and/or rescue option.  Running memtest86
prior to installing Red Hat linux will save numerous 
support calls due to bad/cheap RAM, and also therefore
improve the first user experience.

Suse also has memtest86 as an option on the install CD.

Comment 11 Idcmp 2003-03-21 05:13:13 UTC
Red Hat was praised for "check media", similar praise would happen for "check
memory" - even if poorly documented.

Comment 12 Michael Fulbright 2003-08-12 16:28:29 UTC
Implemented in development branch.

Comment 13 Matthew Miller 2003-08-12 16:43:33 UTC

Comment 14 Matthew Miller 2004-03-02 18:09:39 UTC
So, resolving, since it's in Fedora Core.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.