Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 234698 - kchmviewer: update request to version 3.0
Summary: kchmviewer: update request to version 3.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kchmviewer
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Patrice Dumas
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-31 14:29 UTC by Jose Pedro Oliveira
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-03 21:21:56 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2007-03-31 14:29:04 UTC
Patrice,

Could you update kchmviewer to version 3.0 (it has been released two weeks ago) ?

Tia,
jpo


Additional info:

Homepage:
http://www.kchmviewer.net/

Changes:
Mar 14, 2007   Version 3.0 released.
The most important improverment was a new search engine, which could correctly
search in any language (including Asian languages), and can search for symbols -
so feel free searching for "new SWFActon()" in PHP help. Added DCOP bindings for
KDE version. Chm procesing code moved in a separate library and was rewritten
resulted in up to 20x(!) speed increase for loading large chm files. Fixed a lot
of old bugs, including 'Copy' in KDE, removing a duplicated application title,
and incorrect popup menu position.

Comment 1 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2007-04-03 21:21:56 UTC
Patrice,

Thanks for the update.

It also builds/runs correctly in FC5.

jpo

Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2007-04-04 06:21:47 UTC
Do you want to comaintain kchmviewer? I am not very interested in 
maintaining FC-5, that way you could do it, and also update
if I am not rapid enough.

Comment 3 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2007-04-07 20:00:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do you want to comaintain kchmviewer? I am not very interested in 
> maintaining FC-5, that way you could do it, and also update
> if I am not rapid enough.

Feel free to add me as a co-maintainer. I will maintain it for FC-5.

Regards,
jpo

Comment 4 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2007-04-14 16:54:46 UTC
Patrice,

Just to let you know that I have just synced the kchmviewer FC-5 branch with the
FC-6 one and built it.

Regards,
jpo

Build report:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-extras/31520-kchmviewer-3.0-2.fc5/



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.