Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 234349 - hard dependency on fuse missing
Summary: hard dependency on fuse missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: curlftpfs
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Anderson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-28 17:06 UTC by Thorsten Leemhuis
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-28 17:43:24 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Thorsten Leemhuis 2007-03-28 17:06:19 UTC
Description of problem:
I just installed curlftpfs and wanted to try it and ran into this problem:

$ curlftpfs [...]
fuse: failed to exec fusermount: No such file or directory

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
curlftpfs-0.9-3.fc7

How reproducible:
always

How to fix:
Add "Requires: fuse" to the spec file

Additional info:
I think this package should have been named fuse-curlftpfs ; the first two fuse
modules in fedora used that scheme and it matches our packaging guidelines
afaics. I actually searched for "fuse-*" and nearly had overlooked curlftpfs :-(

Comment 1 David Anderson 2007-03-28 17:23:11 UTC
Tried to update it... cvs commit gives me this... will try again in future...

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/getnotifylist", line 26, in ?
    owners = owners.OwnerList(populate_all = 0)
  File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/owners.py", line 45, in __init__
    self.populate_users()
  File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/owners.py", line 60, in populate_users
    f = 
urllib2.urlopen("http://app1.fedora.phx.redhat.com/admin/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cla_done&format=plain")
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/urllib2.py", line 129, in urlopen
    return _opener.open(url, data)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/urllib2.py", line 326, in open
    '_open', req)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/urllib2.py", line 306, in _call_chain
    result = func(*args)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/urllib2.py", line 901, in http_open
    return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/urllib2.py", line 886, in do_open
    raise URLError(err)
urllib2.URLError: <urlopen error (111, 'Connection refused')>


If fuse-libs useful at all without fuse? Maybe the fuse packager should be 
asked to make them a single package if this is right.

You'll have to hold my hand through changing the name... I've tried to find 
out as little as possible about Fedora's CVS as it seems endlessly confusing 
to me. :-(

Comment 2 Thorsten Leemhuis 2007-03-28 17:34:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Tried to update it... cvs commit gives me this...

No idea what went wrong there 

> will try again in future...

k

> [...]
> If fuse-libs useful at all without fuse? Maybe the fuse packager should be 
> asked to make them a single package if this is right.

fuse-libs has a different license iirc (I packages fuse in the beginning, and
there iirc were good reasons for the split). Multilib issues are another good
reason for a split.
 
> You'll have to hold my hand through changing the name... I've tried to find 
> out as little as possible about Fedora's CVS as it seems endlessly confusing 
> to me. :-(

Let's wait if the others agree renaming is worth the trouble:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00115.html

Comment 3 David Anderson 2007-03-28 17:43:24 UTC
Well, it seems to have committed and built even with those errors.

Fixed in 0.9-5. Closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.