Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 231581 - Orinoco PCMCIA wireless card won't associate with access point
Summary: Orinoco PCMCIA wireless card won't associate with access point
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John W. Linville
QA Contact: Brian Brock
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-03-09 05:38 UTC by David Baron
Modified: 2008-08-02 23:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-03-09 17:31:08 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
messages from dmesg (relevant tail of its output), with annotations (deleted)
2007-03-09 05:38 UTC, David Baron
no flags Details

Description David Baron 2007-03-09 05:38:04 UTC
Description of problem:  My orinoco PCMCIA wireless card won't associate with
the access point.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible: always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. /sbin/iwconfig eth1 essid "my-essid"
2. /sbin/iwconfig eth1
    Actual results: shows correct essid and channel, but shows
          Link Quality=0/92  Signal level=134/153  Noise level=134/153
    Expected results: shows link quality / signal / noise
3. /sbin/ifup eth1
    Actual results:
Determining IP information for eth1... failed; no link present.  Check cable?
4. /sbin/service NetworkManager start
    Actual results:
    NetworkManager won't connect to network, even though the card can scan

Additional info:

Note that /sbin/iwlist eth1 scan only shows good scanning information if I've
run NetworkManager since the last reboot.

The card is, according to lspcmcia -v:
Socket 0 Device 0:      [orinoco_cs]            (bus ID: 0.0)
        Configuration:  state: on
        Product Name:   Lucent Technologies WaveLAN/IEEE Version 01.01 
        Identification: manf_id: 0x0156 card_id: 0x0002
                        function: 6 (network)
                        prod_id(1): "Lucent Technologies" (0x23eb9949)
                        prod_id(2): "WaveLAN/IEEE" (0xc562e72a)
                        prod_id(3): "Version 01.01" (0xd27deb1a)
                        prod_id(4): --- (---)
and on the outside it says it's a Lucent Technologies orinoco 11 Mbit/s SILVER.

I installed F7 test 1 on my old laptop to test it (it previously had Fedora Core
3, and I hadn't used it since Fedora Core 3 was the current release).  So I can
say that this is a regression since FC3, but I suspect that's not very useful.

dmesg shows some interesting messages, but I couldn't get the most interesting
looking one (about a possible circular locking dependency) to happen again, so
I'm not exactly sure what caused it.  However, I'll attach the messages.

Comment 1 David Baron 2007-03-09 05:38:04 UTC
Created attachment 149669 [details]
messages from dmesg (relevant tail of its output), with annotations

Comment 2 John W. Linville 2007-03-09 16:09:50 UTC
Have you tried moving closer to the AP?  Do you know for certain that the card 
is still good?

Comment 3 David Baron 2007-03-09 17:31:08 UTC
Ok, seems the card isn't good anymore.  (I thought I'd tried it in FC3 before
upgrading, but I guess I hadn't.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.