Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 228473 - Review Request: hunspell-es - Spanish hunspell dictionaries
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-es - Spanish hunspell dictionaries
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-02-13 09:50 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-14 10:28:36 UTC
wolfy: fedora-review+
notting: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 09:50:38 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Spanish hunspell dictionaries

Similar to 227811

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-13 13:59:20 UTC

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only text files)
- the license LGPL stated in the tag is the same as the one included in the
source and is included in the package
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output is silent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc are just the LGPL licenses (localised for
Spain and Mexico)
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 


PS: You could also add support for es_BZ (Belize), es_CU (Cuba), es_GU (Guatemala)
Please bug upstream to update the corresponding Readme files on,
over there the license is stated to be GPL and not LGPL as the ones included in
the zip files.

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 14:44:39 UTC
Guatemala is es_GT I believe not es_GU and es_GT is one of the aliases already

es_BZ, es_CU and es_GU don't appear in locale -a | grep es_ and they don't
appear in the drop down of spanish languages in's

Comment 3 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-13 15:06:54 UTC
All those I have mentioned are listed as such at,
under "Los siguientes son disponibles:" (The following are available)

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 15:17:16 UTC
Interesting, I'd say the GU is a typo, unless it's an older unofficial locale
replaced with GT. The other ones don't *seem* to be official locales yet, so
aren't in glibc or OOo. I think I'll leave them out, easier to add them later in
than have to pull them for conflicting with a future allocated locale.

Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 10:28:36 UTC
 27548 (hunspell-es): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.