Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 226966 - CVE-2007-0238 StarCalc overflow
Summary: CVE-2007-0238 StarCalc overflow
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact:
Whiteboard: impact=important,source=openoffice,re...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-02-02 11:25 UTC by Mark J. Cox
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHSA-2007-0033
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-03-22 10:40:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch for 1.5 (deleted)
2007-02-02 11:25 UTC, Mark J. Cox
no flags Details | Diff
Patch for 2 (deleted)
2007-02-02 11:26 UTC, Mark J. Cox
no flags Details | Diff

System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2007:0033 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: security update 2007-03-22 10:39:45 UTC

Description Mark J. Cox 2007-02-02 11:25:52 UTC
John Heasman discovered the StarCalc parser in OpenOffice 2.1 and earlier
contains an easily exploitable stack overflow (at least on the win32 version)
due to incorrect handling of the "Note" record.

If a user opens an untrusted StarCalc document it can potentially run arbitrary
attacker code supplied in the file.  This is therefore a serious issue.

No embargo date set

Comment 1 Mark J. Cox 2007-02-02 11:25:52 UTC
Created attachment 147211 [details]
Patch for 1.5

Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2007-02-02 11:26:57 UTC
Created attachment 147212 [details]
Patch for 2

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-03 19:00:15 UTC
RHEL-3: openoffice_org-1.1.2-37.2.0.EL3
RHEL-4: openoffice_org-1.1.5-9.6.0.EL4
RHEL-4: openoffice_org2-2.0.4-5.5.0

Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-05 09:19:37 UTC
no response with a date from CVE submitter, I *suspect* the same as the libwpd date.

Comment 9 Mark J. Cox 2007-03-22 08:01:36 UTC
well the embargo looks busted by
removing our embargo

Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-03-22 10:40:16 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.