Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 187828 - Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets
Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of out...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 283951
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Brown
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-03 19:36 UTC by Christian Nolte
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-09-09 11:12:33 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christian Nolte 2006-04-03 19:36:40 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

log4net is a port of the excellent log4j framework to the .NET runtime. 
The framework is kept similar in spirit to the original log4j while taking
advantage of new features in the .NET runtime.

Comment 1 John Mahowald 2006-06-03 05:31:28 UTC
Build failed: dos2unix: command not found

Is that log4net.key file a key you generated? I think that should be commented
in the spec, where it came from.

The %_libdir macro isn't going to work. I have not got to that part of the build
yet but I am reasonably sure it'll install to /usr/lib on x86_64 and fail.

Comment 2 John Mahowald 2006-10-11 13:10:30 UTC
With dos2unix as a BuildRequires, I get this:

Target(s) specified: compile-all


The current target framework (Mono 2.0 Profile) is not supported by log4net.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2007-05-31 03:35:47 UTC
Ping Christian. Are you still interested in submitting this package? 
If so, can you address the build failure in comment #2 and upload a new version?

John: If you are reviewing this, please set the fedora-review flag to ? 

If I don't hear anything I will close this review in 1 week. 

Comment 4 John Mahowald 2007-06-01 04:43:55 UTC
Not reviewing this anymore, reassigning to nobody.

Comment 5 Christian Nolte 2007-06-01 08:43:38 UTC
Sorry, but I currently have no time at hand to work on this. 

As a side note: this package is needed by ifolder3 which I tried to package back
then. See also:
Perhaps this could be of help if someone wants to work on that (ifolder is on
the wishlist).

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2007-06-01 16:29:48 UTC
ok. I will go ahead an close this now then. 
If you get some time, feel free to resubmit it or reopen this review request. 

Comment 7 Christopher Brown 2007-09-07 22:30:38 UTC
Sorry for the noise folks. I would like to re-open this review request.

Spec URL:


- This is a mono package and is failing to generate the
requisite package, though I understand this is somewhat commonplace.
- Nant is used to build the package with Strong Name signing.
- Rpmlint is quiet on source, no doc error on devel and complains about no
binary in binary rpm. I understand the latter is also not a blocker.

I am already the maintainer of a couple of other packages and log4net forms part
of around 4-5 which require iFolder to work on Fedora.

Comments appreciated.


Comment 8 Till Maas 2007-09-08 06:39:22 UTC
Chirs, you cannot review you own package, so you should not assign this package
to you and set fedora-review to " ", otherwise no reviewer will find this review
request. I did by accident, because I used the wrong query. ;-) Also I guess the
FE-DEADREVIEW blocker should be removed and you should add yourself to CC. Or
maybe you should open a new review request, to make you reporter of the review
request, I am not sure.

Comment 9 Christopher Brown 2007-09-09 11:12:33 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 283951 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.