Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 187574 - rhel3: sed y command will not accept the newline escape sequence
Summary: rhel3: sed y command will not accept the newline escape sequence
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sed
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Petr Machata
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
Depends On:
Blocks: RHEL3U8CanFix
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-01 03:02 UTC by Michael Gilbert
Modified: 2015-05-05 01:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2006-0362
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-07-20 15:06:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2006:0362 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sed bug fix update 2006-07-19 19:16:00 UTC

Internal Links: 200663

Description Michael Gilbert 2006-04-01 03:02:04 UTC
Description of problem:

the sed y command will not accept the newline escape (and probably other escape
sequences) because they are considered to be multiple characters.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

the version of sed distributed in red hat advance server 3.

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. open shell
2. $ echo test | sed 'y/t/\n/'
Actual results:
sed: -e expression #1, char 7: strings for `y' command are different lengths

Expected results:


Additional info:
can you direct me to a sed rpm that will easily install on redhat advance server
3 that does not suffer this bug?  thank you.

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-07-20 15:06:46 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

Comment 9 giuseppe bonacci 2006-07-27 14:54:02 UTC
escape sequences are not yet properly parsed in the replacement text 
when running in a non-multibyte locale.

in fact, the translation at sed/compile.c:1276 is performed only 
if (MB_CUR_MAX > 1) because of sed/compile.c:1246. 

as a consequence, sed behaviour depends on the particular locale chosen:

[root@green-ALT BUILD]# echo aka | env LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./sed-4.0.7/sed/sed
a       a

[root@green-ALT BUILD]# echo aka | env LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-1 ./sed-4.0.7/sed/sed

[root@green-ALT BUILD]# echo aka | env LANG=C ./sed-4.0.7/sed/sed 'y,k,\t,'

does that make sense?

-- g.b.

Comment 10 Petr Machata 2006-07-31 08:16:25 UTC
Ignoring escape sequences in C locale is intentional, because of POSIX
compatibility.  The ISO-8859-1 locale puzzles me.  It may be for similar reason,
but I can't say right away.  I'll take a look at it.

Comment 11 giuseppe bonacci 2006-07-31 13:47:42 UTC
as far as I can tell, MB_CUR_MAX (in stdlib.h) is the maximum number of bytes composing a character in current locale's charset.  so its value is 1 in all single-byte character sets ---including ascii for C/POSIX and ISO-8859-1 for en_US--- and > 1 in UTF-8 for en_US.UTF-8.  the following code  #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <locale.h>  int main() {     setlocale(LC_ALL, "");     printf("%d\n", MB_CUR_MAX);     return 0; }  outputs the following with my glibc (2.3.5) implementation:  $ for i in C en_US en_US.UTF-8 ; do env LANG=$i ./a.out ; done 1 1 6  as far as I know, translation of utf8 multibyte sequences can be done independently from escape-sequence parsing, because no ascii char can appear in a valid multibyte utf8 sequence.  I really don't know whether a POSIX locale should imply POSIX compliance. however, relying on MB_CUR_MAX might have unseen consequences, e.g. disrupting the test script in your last sed rpm source. ;-)  regards, -- giuseppe 

Comment 12 Petr Machata 2006-08-01 14:52:10 UTC
Please direct all further comments to #200663.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.