Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 172955 - Suggestion: Enable a11y by default in Fedora
Summary: Suggestion: Enable a11y by default in Fedora
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libgnome
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ray Strode [halfline]
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC5Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-11 16:08 UTC by Dave Malcolm
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-11 16:48:46 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dave Malcolm 2005-11-11 16:08:12 UTC
There's a large amount of code in many packages that provides accessibility
hooks.   Most of this code is only run if a11y is enabled.  This has been
disabled by default as it incurs a runtime cost.

Fedora is a distribution which champions the latest software, and advanced
features, such as SELinux, Xen, GNU Classpath/gcj, GCC4 etc have been/are being
integrated into Fedora with great benefits to both Fedora and to the upstream
projects.

Should we do the same for accessibility?  I think a11y has matured to the point
where it ought to be enabled by default, and only disabled if people are in a
low-memory situation.

Or maybe we could enable it for the first FC5 test release(s) and disable it for
the later release(s)?

Thoughts?

Going lower-level:
Filing against the libgnome package as it provides the schema for the 
/desktop/gnome/interface/accessibility GConf key

This is in /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_interface.schema
it defaults to false

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libgnome-2.12.0.1-2

Comment 1 Ray Strode [halfline] 2005-11-11 16:48:46 UTC
Hi I think rather than doing this for test releases of Fedora, you should lobby
upstream about getting it enabled by default for the development releases of
gnome.  You'll get a wider testing audience that way, and a larger interested
developer community to help fix the problems that pop up.

Comment 2 Dave Malcolm 2005-11-11 17:22:01 UTC
Good idea.  

I've posted some ideas about this upstream here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-November/msg00037.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.