Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 1694455 - file level snapshots using reflink in a posix only volume
Summary: file level snapshots using reflink in a posix only volume
Keywords:
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: posix
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: bugs@gluster.org
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-03-31 15:19 UTC by Raghavendra Bhat
Modified: 2019-03-31 20:36 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Gluster.org Gerrit 22453 None Open [WIP]: file snapshots using reflink 2019-03-31 20:36:38 UTC

Description Raghavendra Bhat 2019-03-31 15:19:39 UTC
Description of problem:

Ability to take file level snapshots for a single brick volume.
Using setxattr interface, provide a mechanism to take snapshots of file(s).
The same setxattr interface can be used to delete the snapshots as well.

Ex: setfattr -n glusterfs.snapshot -v <snapshot name> <file path>
    setfattr -n glusterfs.removesnap -v <snapshot name> <file path> 

The snapshots can be viewed from <mount point>/.fsnaps/<gfid of the file>


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2019-03-31 20:36:40 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22453 ([WIP]: file snapshots using reflink) posted (#1) for review on master by Raghavendra Bhat


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.