Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 1692117 - black is an application, package should be called black [NEEDINFO]
Summary: black is an application, package should be called black
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-black
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miro Hrončok
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-03-24 12:11 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2019-04-10 16:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
mhroncok: needinfo? (cheimes)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2019-03-24 12:11:14 UTC
The name of the built package doesn't follow Fedora's standards. It is an application and thus it should be called "black", not "python3-black".

If you agree, I can sand a backwards compatible pull request.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-03-24 12:27:04 UTC
(Also note that I was looking into packaging black and found this package, I'd be happy to co-maintain.)

Comment 2 Christian Heimes 2019-03-25 07:01:28 UTC
I neither mind a co-maintainer nor renaming the package. What about the dist-git and BZ component? Do you want to rename them, too?

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2019-03-25 09:26:32 UTC
> What about the dist-git and BZ component? Do you want to rename them, too?

Probably not worth it.

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2019-04-10 16:45:12 UTC
Would you add me as a maintainer? Shall I merge the PR?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.