Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 1688676 - Package mingw-python3 also/instead
Summary: Package mingw-python3 also/instead
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: mingw-python2
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sandro Mani
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-03-14 08:25 UTC by Elliott Sales de Andrade
Modified: 2019-03-17 08:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-03-14 08:25:23 UTC
This is not really a bug in mingw-python2 per se, but more of an RFE. There is mingw-python2 but no mingw-python3.

With Fedora's push to remove Python 2 from the native distro, it seems only prudent to also at least provide Python 3 in cross-compiled MinGW files.

Comment 1 Sandro Mani 2019-03-14 08:41:32 UTC
I'll be working on this in the coming weeks.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2019-03-14 09:35:37 UTC
Note that we (Python Maint at Red Hat) have decided not to persuade this as we don't maintain the mingw stack at all. That said, it obviously makes sense to switch to Python 3 even with mingw.

Comment 3 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-03-17 08:30:36 UTC
Well, I don't know about that. But not having Python 3 makes it really difficult to recommend to upstreams who want to test and have dropped 2 entirely since that's the way the Linux distros are going. (Note, I'm speaking about gobject-introspection here and they are specifically looking for cross-compiling, not just testing on Windows.)

Comment 4 Sandro Mani 2019-03-17 08:42:39 UTC
Well a big portion of Fedora packaging is done on a voluntary basis and depending on the needs of the respective packager. You are completely free to provide the packages you are missing yourself. In this specific case, as stated above, I'll be able to work on it soon, probably by the end of Q2. If that is not quick enough for you, please do feel free look into it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.