Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 162665 - bazaar and gd-progs have conflicting programs -- /usr/bin/annotate
Summary: bazaar and gd-progs have conflicting programs -- /usr/bin/annotate
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: bazaar
Version: 4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shahms E. King
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-07-07 13:15 UTC by Toshio Kuratomi
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 1.4.2-2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-07-07 19:55:17 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Toshio Kuratomi 2005-07-07 13:15:14 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 Fedora/1.0.4-4 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
gd-progs and bazaar each have an annotate program stored in /usr/bin/

The files conflict; preventing installation of both packages at the same time.
One or both packages needs to do some renaming to resolve the situation.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install bazaar
2. yum install gd-progs

Actual Results:  esolving Dependencies
Error : Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/bin/annotate from install of gd-progs-2.0.33-2 conflicts with file from package bazaar-1.4.2-1.fc4

Expected Results:  Smooth install of both packages.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Shahms E. King 2005-07-07 14:57:44 UTC
Thanks for the report, I will rename annotate to baz-annotate in the bazaar package.

Comment 2 Shahms E. King 2005-07-07 19:55:17 UTC
After poking through the mailing lists, it appears as though the standalone
annotate binary shouldn't be installed at all.  The specfile now removes the
binary if it gets installed.  This should fix the issue.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.