Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 158937 - cups-config-daemon Isn't a PIE
Summary: cups-config-daemon Isn't a PIE
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: hal-cups-utils
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Aillon
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC5Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-05-26 23:42 UTC by Dave Jones
Modified: 2015-01-04 22:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 0.5.5-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-12 20:34:43 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dave Jones 2005-05-26 23:42:49 UTC
Daemons really should be built as PIE where possible, by passing -fpie -pie
compile flags.

It seems none of the CUPS daemons are currently built this way

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2005-05-27 08:26:08 UTC
Er.. how did you test this?  I get this from lsexec:

cupsd, PID 2156: PIE, execshield enabled


Comment 2 Dave Jones 2005-05-28 01:29:09 UTC
ah, misfiled bug.

cups-config-daemon, PID 5935: no PIE, execshield enabled

belongs to hal.


Comment 3 John (J5) Palmieri 2005-05-29 08:14:05 UTC
Ray can you look at this while I am away?

Comment 4 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-14 02:26:42 UTC
ping

Comment 5 Ray Strode [halfline] 2006-01-11 18:30:21 UTC
caillon said he wants this one.  he loves pie apparently.  This really shouldn't
be a blocker though. moving to target.

Comment 6 Christopher Aillon 2006-01-12 07:20:26 UTC
appears fixed for me...

cups-config-daemon, PID    374: no PIE, no RELRO, execshield enabled


Comment 7 Christopher Aillon 2006-01-12 07:21:39 UTC
duh, don't read bugs this late at night.  was looking at execshield stuff before
this.  yeah, this should get fixed.

Comment 8 Christopher Aillon 2006-01-12 20:34:43 UTC
Fixed in 0.5.5-1


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.