Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 147475 - Mesa DRI drivers disable exec-shield
Summary: Mesa DRI drivers disable exec-shield
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xorg-x11
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: X/OpenGL Maintenance List
QA Contact: David Lawrence
: 147474 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FC5Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-02-08 12:15 UTC by Mike A. Harris
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-01-18 00:30:07 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mike A. Harris 2005-02-08 12:15:19 UTC
In XFree86 4.3.0, we had to patch the Mesa DRI drivers to call
mprotect and mark memory allocated for runtime code generation
with PROT_EXEC.  John Dennis created our patch that implemented
this, and I believe it was submitted upstream, however a recent
report by Arjan shows that Mesa still disables exec-shield.

./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
xorg-x11-6.8.1-23.EL.i386      ./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
./usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ stack=RWE
xorg-x11-libs-6.8.1-23.EL.i386 ./usr/X11R6/lib/     

It appears the patch never got accepted and integrated into Mesa CVS.
The old patch is still present in our current xorg rpm disabled.

Here are my own thoughts on the proper approach for someone to
tackle fixing this:

1) Open a discussion on the topic on Mesa-dev mailing list to find
   out if current Mesa CVS head or any existing stable Mesa releases
   have already fixed this (or look at the CVS code directly).

2) Assuming it is still not fixed in Mesa CVS, propose a solution
   on mesa-dev and discuss it until Brian et al. agree the solution
   will be acceptable into the Mesa CVS tree.

3) If someone goes ahead and does the work, great.  If not, then we
   should implement the solution discussed and agreed upon on
   mesa-dev, and submit it to Mesa.

4) Once the code is checked into Mesa CVS (and no sooner IMHO), we
   should then backport it to the Mesa in Xorg CVS head and get it
   checked into Xorg CVS, and into Mesa CVS stable branch of same
   Mesa release.

5) Once it is in Xorg CVS head, we should backport it to 6.8.x,
   and get it checked into both Mesa and Xorg CVS stable branches
   assuming it's accepted.

The final step is applying the patches to our rpms, which I would
place at step 6, to ensure that this is fully handled upstream
before we ship patched rpms again, so that we know we wont have
to port it again and again and again forever.

Comment 2 Mike A. Harris 2005-02-08 12:27:21 UTC
*** Bug 147474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Mike A. Harris 2006-01-18 00:30:07 UTC
Fedora Core 3 is now transferred to the Fedora Legacy project.  This problem
should be resolved in rawhide X11R7 now, with Mesa 6.4.2, however there is
no plan on backporting this to older Fedora Core releases, as the code in
Mesa has changed significantly over time.

Users who desire an exec-shield friendly Mesa implementation, are encouraged
to upgrade to Fedora Core 5 once it is released.

Setting status to "RAWHIDE"

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.