Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 1373709 - Documentation: working example of listing out container/pod usage information [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Documentation: working example of listing out container/pod usage information
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: API
Version: 5.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: cfme-future
Assignee: Gregg Tanzillo
QA Contact: Dave Johnson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1354029 1374377
Blocks: 1373712 1373714 1373715 1373717 1373718
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-07 03:11 UTC by Mike Barrett
Modified: 2017-11-08 17:40 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1354029
: 1373712 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-08 17:40:21 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
bazulay: needinfo? (gtanzill)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 3 Mike Barrett 2016-09-15 21:37:52 UTC
We have been successful to pull the projects associated to a provider (https://{cloudform-domain}/api/providers/{provider_ems_id}?attributes=container_projects); I am currently at not sure how to progress any further to get additional information regarding the project or the labels/tags associated with it.
 
Sample results:
{
        "href" : "https://XXXXX.uhc.com/api/providers/20000000000001",
        "id" : 20000000000001,
        "name" : "ELR Core",
        "created_on" : "2016-07-05T18:54:40Z",
        "updated_on" : "2016-09-15T13:48:34Z",
        "guid" : "ee02a9f4-42e1-11e6-a3e3-00505699174f",
        "zone_id" : 20000000000001,
        "type" : "ManageIQ::Providers::OpenshiftEnterprise::ContainerManager",
        "last_refresh_date" : "2016-09-15T13:48:34Z",
        "tenant_id" : 20000000000001,
        "container_projects" : [{
                        "id" : 20000000000001,
                        "ems_ref" : "119a9419-3330-11e6-b734-005056a46128",
                        "name" : "16-npatel28-dev",
                        "ems_created_on" : "2016-06-15T19:33:42Z",
                        "resource_version" : "15340275",
                        "display_name" : "16-npatel28-dev",
                        "ems_id" : 20000000000001,
                        "created_on" : "2016-07-05T18:55:26Z"
                }, {
                        "id" : 20000000000002,
                        "ems_ref" : "ef51c82d-332f-11e6-b734-005056a46128",
                        "name" : "16-npatel28-tst",
                        "ems_created_on" : "2016-06-15T19:32:45Z",
                        "resource_version" : "15339819",
                        "display_name" : "16-npatel28-tst",
                        "ems_id" : 20000000000001,
                        "created_on" : "2016-07-05T18:55:26Z"
                }, {
                …
                }
        ],
        "actions" : [{
…
                }
        ]
}
 
Please let me know if there is any additional URI parameters or other API calls that I can invoke access a projects tags/labels

Comment 4 Tsai Li Ming 2017-06-28 16:02:23 UTC
What about resource quota / limit range? Can we add that?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.