Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.
Bug 1363626 - [docs bug] RHOSP 8 docs use 'overcloud-novacompute-0' in the example HostnameMap but it should be 'overcloud-compute-0'
Summary: [docs bug] RHOSP 8 docs use 'overcloud-novacompute-0' in the example Hostname...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Dan Macpherson
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-03 08:59 UTC by Marios Andreou
Modified: 2017-09-12 16:43 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-12 16:43:07 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marios Andreou 2016-08-03 08:59:19 UTC
Description of problem:
RHOSP 8 docs use 'overcloud-novacompute-0' in the example HostnameMap but it should be 'overcloud-compute-0'

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/8/single/director-installation-and-usage/#sect-Custom_Hostnames

This has come up as part of a customer case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362576

By default compute nodes are assigned 'overcloud-compute-N' and so following the documented example HostnameMap they wouldn't get a successful deployment. Unless of course  they *also* override/customize the HostnameFormat to actually make their compute nodes use 'overcloud-novacompute-N' but imo we should just fix the example to say 'overcloud-compute-0'.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Dan Macpherson 2017-09-12 06:23:26 UTC
Hi marios,

Was going through my backlog and found this BZ. I checked the section you linked to (and it's respective content for all versions since) and it seems to be fixed.

Any chance you can verify that the issue is resolved?

Comment 3 Dan Macpherson 2017-09-12 06:25:10 UTC
Accidentally NEEDINFO'd myself :S

Comment 4 Marios Andreou 2017-09-12 16:17:21 UTC
lgtm thanks for checking Dan


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.