Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 85364

Summary: Anaconda should notify better when network media is not present/becomes unavailable.
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Ken Snider <ksnider>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:52:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
anaconda dump generated by RH 8 Install none

Description Ken Snider 2003-02-28 16:33:23 UTC
Description of problem:

During an NFS custom install of RedHat 8.0, anaconda triggered an exception
while installing the package glibc-utils.

I'm attacking the anaconda dump to the bug.

Comment 1 Ken Snider 2003-02-28 16:39:21 UTC
Created attachment 90427 [details]
anaconda dump generated by RH 8 Install

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2003-02-28 17:06:29 UTC
Did you have disc3 present and readable in your nfs export?

Comment 3 Ken Snider 2003-02-28 17:28:32 UTC
BAH no. that was indeed the issue. How an ISO image that was present for some 30
installs suddenly disappeared intreigues me, but is not Red Hat's problem.

Can I now request, instead, that this bug be treated as an enhancement request,
for a more user-friendly answer in the case that media is unavailable?

Comment 4 Michael Fulbright 2003-03-07 19:26:55 UTC
I believe this is a dupe of bug 73318, would you agree?

Comment 5 Ken Snider 2003-03-08 16:30:51 UTC
I don't know, I'm afraid. I'm not authorized to see bug 73318. :)

Comment 6 Michael Fulbright 2003-03-12 17:28:51 UTC
Sorry...

Could you look now?


Comment 7 Ken Snider 2003-03-12 17:43:31 UTC
Yes, I'd agree it's a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 73318 ***

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:52:02 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.