|Summary:||gnumeric in current Raw Hide won't start up|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide||Reporter:||Jonathan Kamens <jik>|
|Component:||glibc||Assignee:||Jakub Jelinek <jakub>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Brian Brock <bbrock>|
|Version:||1.0||CC:||fweimer, hp, marcel|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2003-01-15 18:05:14 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Jonathan Kamens 2003-01-08 16:45:53 UTC
My whole machine is current with respect to today's Raw Hide. jik:~!34> rpm -q gnumeric gnumeric-1.0.9-6 jik:~!35> rpm --verify gnumeric jik:~!36> gnumeric Bonobo-WARNING **: Syntax error in '' At this point it hangs.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-01-10 05:15:33 UTC
*** Bug 81480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2003-01-14 03:32:12 UTC
twaugh said it worked with newer libc/kernel. Please verify when the next beta comes out.
Comment 3 Jonathan Kamens 2003-01-14 09:04:39 UTC
With glibc-2.3.1-34 and the current Raw Hide kernel at work, gnumeric now starts up. However, at home with glibc-2.3.1-34 and a 2.4.20-ac2 kernel (i.e., no NPTL), gnumeric continues to hang when I try to start it.
Comment 4 Jay Turner 2003-01-14 14:49:17 UTC
With the re0113.0 tree, gnumeric is working as expected: gnumeric-1.0.12-1 kernel-2.4.20-2.14 glibc-2.3.1-34 However, going to push this issue back to assigned to get a ruling on the behavior seen under a non-NPTL kernel.
Comment 5 Havoc Pennington 2003-01-14 15:07:06 UTC
Moving to glibc - I don't know if glibc is supposed to be working in this case or not.
Comment 6 Jonathan Kamens 2003-01-15 18:02:03 UTC
I am no longer convinced that this is a NPTL issue. I saw gnumeric hang at work again this morning, i.e., on the machine which has the NPTL kernel and glibc. I updated to the current Raw Hide and rebooted, and the hang went away. I don't know whether the reboot or the update is what cured the problem.
Comment 7 Jakub Jelinek 2003-01-15 18:05:14 UTC
Lately gnumeric was stuck with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 because of libc+linuxthreads bug, which ought to be fixed in glibc-2.3.1-36.