Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 7033

Summary: Cannot boot with boot floppy
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Jeff Mangiapane <jnmangiapane>
Component: installerAssignee: Jay Turner <jturner>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.2CC: srevivo
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-02-09 13:33:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Jeff Mangiapane 1999-11-15 23:51:51 UTC
I have been a user of Linux since 1993 and purchased Red Hat version 4.2 a
couple of years ago.  I have not used it for about a year and since the
last time I used Linux, I have changed my hardware and software.  I have
installed Windows 98 and use an AMD K6 3D Now! 350 MHz processor with an
Asus P2B-F motherboard.

I ran the installation program and created the boot loader on a floppy
disk.  I rebooted the system with the new boot disk and the system did not
boot.  Instead an output of 1's and 0's displayed on the screen

I have never had a problem before using a floppy boot disk or installing
Linux.  Last time I installed Linux was on an Intel Pentium 100 MHz

Is this problem due to the AMD processor?  If so, is this something that
can be fixed, or am I just out of luck?

Comment 1 Jay Turner 2000-02-09 13:33:59 UTC
Sounds like you have a corrupt boot disk which is causing this problem.  That or
the 4.2 Lilo is not capable of seeing the new hardware that you have.  Both of
these are of equal possibility.  We have a lot of trouble keeping machines
around in the test lab which we can load 4.2 on, so I would not be surprised to
find out that it was the new hardware causing the problem.