|Summary:||up2date-generated web pages don't include description/changelog|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||George Karabin <gkarabin>|
|Component:||up2date||Assignee:||Preston Brown <pbrown>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2000-05-05 17:21:58 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description George Karabin 1999-11-07 20:22:47 UTC
It would be nice if up2date would include the description of the bug/security hole/upgrade included in the errata pages. Otherwise, users who want to know what the new package fixes have to go hunt down a link manually - up2date ought to be good at that sort of thing. Even better, the history of updates from the base release (i.e, RedHat 6.1) should be linked as well. For example, if a package update has been updated twice since the RH6.1 release, there ought to be a 2 links to upgrade descriptions for that pacakge. Also, it would be nice if the RPM changelog were available from the up2date-generated page as well.
Comment 1 Preston Brown 2000-05-05 17:21:59 UTC
this is a good suggestion, we will be incorporating this into our service in the future.
Comment 2 Preston Brown 2001-02-12 18:31:49 UTC
*** Bug 27151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Daniel Roesen 2001-02-12 19:27:43 UTC
Shouldn't that bug be re-classified into "enhancement" and RESOLVED/DEFERRED?