Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 624099

Summary: [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-6.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:d295e850722cb667750622e3bfe061646574574c
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 13:42:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Fabian Deutsch 2010-08-13 16:16:54 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: d295e850722cb667750622e3bfe061646574574c
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.30.1-6.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Close nautilus using ctrl-w
2.
3.

Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2010-08-13 16:16:57 UTC
Created attachment 438719 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:42:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 587508 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:42:39 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #587508.

Sorry for the inconvenience.