|Summary:||[PATCH] Intel i915 drm driver doesnot correctly enumerates output|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||vadim <vadim.v.panov>|
|Component:||xorg-x11-drv-intel||Assignee:||Adam Jackson <ajax>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||14||CC:||ajax, anton, awilliam, dougsland, gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, kevin, vadim.v.panov, xgl-maint|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-10-07 09:17:15 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description vadim 2010-05-28 13:59:37 UTC
Created attachment 417616 [details] patch to fix i915 cannot correctly attach svdo->vga converter. the problem is in counting outputs of same type. svdo output connector first created, but then output type is modified. But output type modification should follow "devices of that type" counter modification I submitted patch to kernel, but I constantly use Fedora, and I have to use fedora 10. Now I can upgrade to FC13 with rawhide kernel. Kernel very close to fox Intel SDVO->VGA, I hope patch will be on rawhide very soon https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16068
Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-03 19:07:41 UTC
Moving this over to xorg-x11-drv-intel for review and further comment.
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:44:18 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle. Changing version to '14'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2010-10-06 22:10:58 UTC
Looks like upstream's been more conscientious about this than we have - Jesse wrote in July that it should be fixed upstream. Reporter, has this fix made it downstream to whichever Fedora you're on now?
Comment 4 vadim 2010-10-07 09:17:15 UTC
This bug is fixed for kernels >= 2.6.35. Tested on 184.108.40.206, 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168.
Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2010-10-07 15:43:28 UTC
OK. We're on 2.6.35 for F14 so that's probably good enough. thanks for testing!