Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 593146

Summary: [abrt] crash in compiz-0.8.2-24.fc12: Process /usr/bin/compiz was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rhys <rhysllanelli>
Component: compizAssignee: Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: adel.gadllah
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:54cf160a845c0d1647a8461118845f8e8c1aab01
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:20:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Rhys 2010-05-17 23:53:01 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: compiz --ignore-desktop-hints glib gconf gnomecompat --replace
comment: Compiz is way too sluggish takes 2 or 3 seconds for anything to happen, worked fine before first update after installation. Starting to get a little impatient with this
component: compiz
executable: /usr/bin/compiz
global_uuid: 54cf160a845c0d1647a8461118845f8e8c1aab01
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE
package: compiz-0.8.2-24.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/bin/compiz was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1.run compiz
2.close compiz
3.

Comment 1 Rhys 2010-05-17 23:53:04 UTC
Created attachment 414695 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:20:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 541740 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:20:39 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #541740.

Sorry for the inconvenience.