Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 592707

Summary: [abrt] crash in gnash-1:0.8.7-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/gtk-gnash was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: John Williams <web582>
Component: gnashAssignee: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: jreznik, kevin, pertusus, tomeu
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:cb7ae27e2b010fc4c2ef3654a2955cfed61d5129
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 08:46:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description John Williams 2010-05-16 12:23:42 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/gtk-gnash -x 92274844 -j 1000 -k 750 -u -F 13 -U -P PARAM= -P SRC= -P align=middle -P allowfullscreen=true -P allowscriptaccess=always -P base= -P bgcolor=#e1e1e1 -P data= -P devicefont=false -P flashvars=partner_id=WMGs4POB1ko-a&
component: gnash
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/gtk-gnash
global_uuid: cb7ae27e2b010fc4c2ef3654a2955cfed61d5129
package: gnash-1:0.8.7-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gtk-gnash was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
1. Clicked a website link - didn't even know it was flash

Comment 1 John Williams 2010-05-16 12:23:48 UTC
Created attachment 414345 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:46:21 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 573211 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:46:21 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #573211.

Sorry for the inconvenience.