|Summary:||Signal 11 when compiling the kernel|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||m.flower|
|Component:||egcs||Assignee:||Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||1999-11-02 21:55:48 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description m.flower 1999-10-11 03:27:30 UTC
I am running on a Cyrix 6x86 P200+ machine. Compiling the kernel gets a signal 11 from the c compiler. This problem occured in a previous redhat release, and there was a re-release of the compiler. The problem is actually a H/W problem with the 6x86 from memory. I would like to know if there is going to be another work around. ...mcf
Comment 1 Jim Kingdon 1999-10-26 16:22:59 UTC
Can you be more specific about this fix which was issued in the past? I saw a possible reference to something of the sort in bugzilla 1115 but I searched a number of mailing lists, bugzilla, &c, for "Cyrix" and I didn't find it.
Comment 2 Jim Kingdon 1999-10-26 16:27:59 UTC
Found it. http://www.redhat.com/corp/support/errata/rh50-errata-general.html under "cyrix". As nearly as I can tell from what is there, they didn't actually fix anything in that gcc, they just found that it seemed to not happen to hit the crash. If you find anything more about what is going on, feel free to let us know.
Comment 3 Jim Kingdon 1999-11-02 21:07:59 UTC
*** Bug 6617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hardware: Cyrix 6x86 PR200+, 64Mb RAM, 128Mb swap I have been running RedHat on this box since (at least) 5.2, very few problems. I previously had upgraded to 6.0 with no real problems, I upgraded to 6.1 yesterday, no problems during the upgrade. I then tried to re-compile php and got serious problems with egcs. During the make, I got seemingly random compiler crashes, error was: gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 typing make again sometimes compiled a few more modules, sometimes not. I know errors of this type have been attributed to hardware problems in the past, but I'm fairly sure that is _not_ the case here. I noticed that the version of egcs is the same in both RH6.1 and RH6.0, so I re-installed the older egcs package using: rpm --force -ivh egcs-1.1.2-12.i386.rpm I then did a make clean and a make in the php directory and it built without problem, so it looks like there has been a change between egcs-1.1.2-12.i386.rpm and egcs-1.1.2-24.i386.rpm which is causing problems (at least for me :-). I did not try to re-install the later version again, I will do so and let you know if this fixes things (ie in case a wierd dependency thing happened). (There was a problem like this a few RedHat releases ago, RedHat provided a special build of gcc/egcs to fix the problem.) I use several 'real' pentiums here at work, currently running 6.0, I may try upgrading one, though I'm a little apprehensive as I cannot afford much downtime. I got the 6.1 distribution from ftp.redhat.com as an iso image, md5sum was ok, wrote it with Adaptec's Easy CD Creator on Win32, no problems. Any suggestions? Thanks, Simon
Comment 4 Anonymous 1999-11-02 21:36:59 UTC
Last night I tried removing (rpm -e) all traces of egcs, then doing a fresh install of egcs from the 6.1 CD. I used rpm --verify to check it, no complaints. I tried the php compile, and again it failed on the first C file. Again I removed egcs and re-installed from 6.0 and the compile was fine. Can I find out what was changed between egcs-1.1.2-12 and egcs-1.1.2-24 ? the last number is a build number isn't it? Why was it rebuilt? What changed? Simon -----
Comment 5 Jim Kingdon 1999-11-02 21:55:59 UTC
The first place to look in terms of what has changed is "rpm -q --changelog egcs". For more detail, do something like: mkdir twelve; cd twelve rpm2cpio <egcs-1.1.2-12.src.rpm | cpio --extract cd ..; mkdir twentyfour; cd twentyfour rpm2cpio <egcs-1.1.2-24.src.rpm | cpio --extract cd .. diff -u -r twelve twentyfour My guess is that the difference in -12 and -24 isn't any of the patches, though, my guess is that it changed the location of some code/data or something else basically inexplicable. If you find out more, please do let us know.