Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 4892

Summary: dup2(1, OPEN_MAX) return is not POSIX.1 conformant
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Jay Turner <jturner>
Component: kernelAssignee: Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: alan, srevivo
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-04-22 06:09:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Glen Foster 1999-09-03 19:10:52 UTC
According to POSIX.1 (page 149,, lines 70-74), a
call to dup2(1, sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX)) should set errno to
EBADF, but instead (incorrectly) sets errno == EMFILE.

This is seen running the PCTS on a stock 6.0 Intel system.

Comment 1 Cristian Gafton 2000-01-04 22:25:59 UTC
Assigned to dledford

Comment 2 Cristian Gafton 2000-01-04 22:26:59 UTC
Assigned to dledford

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2000-02-05 23:31:59 UTC
Still exists in 2.2.15pre5.

Comment 4 Doug Ledford 2000-04-22 06:09:59 UTC
Last I knew, this is a backwards compatibility issue.  In order to keep older
binaries from breaking on new kernels that support thousands of open files in a
single application, the kernels have to *pretend* like OPEN_MAX is 1024, like it
used to be.  However, to those applications that know about it, they can call
setrlimit() to increase the number of files allowed.  As far as I know, the
result of this situation is that we have some differing error returns and this
is by design.  If that's wrong, then I'm sure Alan can correct it ;-)