|Summary:||Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Aaron S. Hawley <aaronh>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||aaron.s.hawley, fedora-package-review, notting|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-11-02 21:17:01 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Aaron S. Hawley 2008-11-03 06:24:45 UTC
Spec URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-appserver.spec SRPM URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-appserver-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: This is a the follow-up to the gnue-commons Review Request. Bug #439310 The GNU Enterprise Application Server is the core of the n-tier variant of the GNU Enterprise system. To the front end (be it GNUe Forms, GNUe Reports or any other tool), it provides user-definable business objects with arbitrary fields and methods. While transforming access to those fields and methods into database communication and calling of scripts, it cares about stability, security, speed, and consistency. A good test of the package is to make sure the application service starts. Further testing requires a package to connect to the application server as a data source. Here are simple instructions for setting up the application server. They require the gnue-forms package that is not in Fedora (yet!). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_GNUe_Appserver sha1sums: 8f653a0f2f4c0cc84664faec91f5a352aa840361 gnue-appserver-0.5.2.tar.gz e2c38663789762910269388510956d7bd1df3c66 gnue-appserver-0.5.2-1.src.rpm
Comment 1 Aaron S. Hawley 2009-04-22 15:04:56 UTC
My email address has changed.
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 02:37:23 UTC
Just checking old review tickets. This one fails to build because patch1 fails to apply. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a fixed package.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-25 23:29:00 UTC
This is still marked as not building and as a bonus the URLs are 404. I'll close it soon if that's not rectified.
Comment 4 Aaron S. Hawley 2010-01-26 00:49:13 UTC
If there's interest in getting this reviewed, I can try to find time to generate a new build for rawhide (or F12) sometime next week.