|Summary:||Fedora LiveCD doesn't boot in Blu-Ray Drives.|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jack Peirce <jpeirce>|
|Component:||LiveCD||Assignee:||Jeremy Katz <katzj>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-15 08:16:45 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Jack Peirce 2008-07-10 16:56:07 UTC
Description of problem: Blu-Ray Drives cannot successfully load the kernel in Fedora 8 and 9. They fail on mounting the root fs, then dump to a bash shell where I am told to create a symlink for /dev/root and exit the shell to continue the boot process. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Broken for me in both 8 and 9. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot a live cd off a Blu-Ray Device 2. Error! Additional info: Only tried on a Lite-On SATA 2x Blu-Ray combo CD/DVD/BD drive. On machines with 4xQC processors, 16GB RAM. Two duplicate machines each have this problem.
Comment 1 Jack Peirce 2008-07-10 22:03:49 UTC
Created attachment 311518 [details] sosreport sosreport on the machine
Comment 2 Jack Peirce 2008-07-10 22:04:55 UTC
Relevant output of lsscsi --verbose -c: Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Target: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: LITE-ON Model: BD B LH-2B1S Rev: AL09 Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: ffffffff dir: /sys/bus/scsi/devices/0:0:0:0 Note: Device works fine under F9 when installed.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2008-07-10 23:28:50 UTC
Can you get the output of lshal? And lsmod isn't in the sysreport for some reason and could also be handy. And is the drive connected to the internal sata (sata_nv)?
Comment 4 Jack Peirce 2008-07-10 23:59:02 UTC
The drive is connected through a internal SAS port on the motherboard. I'll get the output of lshal and lsmod sometime tomorrow. For any other information you might need, please let me know by tomorrow, as these machines have to ship out to MIT sometime tomorrow, they're not my personal machines.
Comment 5 Jeremy Katz 2008-07-11 01:37:43 UTC
Hmm, might be a module that we're not including in the initrd then. That's the biggest reason I can think of. When you're at the shell, you can also check and see if /sys/block/sr0 exists (guessing not). A little hard to guess what else might be useful, but I'm at least partially convinced that it's a module not there now
Comment 6 Jack Peirce 2008-07-11 15:20:35 UTC
Created attachment 311592 [details] lshal from Installed F9 System
Comment 7 Jack Peirce 2008-07-11 15:21:17 UTC
Created attachment 311593 [details] lsmod from installed F9 system
Comment 8 Jack Peirce 2008-07-11 15:22:36 UTC
Created attachment 311594 [details] lsmod from F9 Live system Note: /sys/block/sr0 does not exist.
Comment 9 Jeremy Katz 2008-07-11 16:10:04 UTC
We didn't include mptsas in the list of modules in the initrd -- I've added it to git and so the F10 images should have it
Comment 10 Bug Zapper 2009-06-10 02:01:46 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 11 Bug Zapper 2009-07-15 08:16:45 UTC
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.