|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Tethys <tethys>|
|Component:||xulrunner||Assignee:||Christopher Aillon <caillon>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||9||CC:||caillon, gecko-bugs-nobody, johnp, mcepl, stransky, walters|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-14 17:49:30 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Tethys 2008-07-09 16:47:34 UTC
Description of problem: Install firefox with yum. Get unwanted and unneeded metacity package at the same time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xulrunner-1.9-1.fc9.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install firefox 2. 3. Actual results: ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: firefox x86_64 3.0-1.fc9 updates 9.3 M Installing for dependencies: fedora-gnome-theme noarch 8.0.0-2.fc9 updates 10 k libgnome x86_64 2.22.0-3.fc9 fedora 980 k metacity x86_64 2.22.0-3.fc9 fedora 2.3 M nodoka-metacity-theme noarch 0.3.90-1.fc9 fedora 8.2 k xulrunner x86_64 1.9-1.fc9 updates 8.7 M Expected results: ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: firefox x86_64 3.0-1.fc9 updates 9.3 M Installing for dependencies: xulrunner x86_64 1.9-1.fc9 updates 8.7 M Additional info: The problem seems to be that firefox requires xulrunner, which requires libgnome which requires nodoka-metacity-theme, which requires metacity. But Firefox (and by implication xulrunner) categorically do no require libgnome or metacity to run, and thus they should not be a dependencies as far as I can see. Maybe they can make use of them in some way if they're installed. But they don't need them to be installed. For those of us trying to run a minimal system, dependency bugs like this are a real problem.
Comment 1 Christopher Aillon 2008-07-09 17:41:01 UTC
Yeah, it is currently a soft dependency on libgnome, as the libraries we need are accessed via dlopen() but I think it will change to be a link/runtime dependency at some point so it's probably unfair for me to make this change only to have it reappear. I'm slightly more interested in why libgnome pulls in everything it does, but I bet there's good reason for that, too...
Comment 2 Matěj Cepl 2008-07-14 07:13:37 UTC
Related bug is bug 454890 (probably duplicate, but in the context of OLPC the situation might be different).
Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2009-06-10 01:59:56 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2009-07-14 17:49:30 UTC
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.