Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 453611

Summary: /usr/share/rhn/satellite_tools/connection.pyc and friends are owned by both rhns-xml-export-libs and rhns-satellite-tools
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora>
Component: ServerAssignee: Clifford Perry <cperry>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satellite-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 510CC: cperry
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-09 10:21:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Jan Pazdziora 2008-07-01 15:13:56 UTC
Description of problem:

Some files in the /usr/share/rhn/satellite_tools/ directory are owned by both
rhns-xml-export-libs and rhns-satellite-tools.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

# rpm -qf /usr/share/rhn/satellite_tools/connection.pyc
rhns-xml-export-libs-5.1.1-9
rhns-satellite-tools-5.1.1-9

How reproducible:

Deterministic.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # rpm -qf /usr/share/rhn/satellite_tools/connection.pyc
  
Actual results:

rhns-xml-export-libs-5.1.1-9
rhns-satellite-tools-5.1.1-9

Expected results:

Only one package listed.

Additional info:

Comment 4 Clifford Perry 2014-05-09 10:21:31 UTC
We have not addressed this specific bug for over 4 years. This bug was reported as either Satellite 5.0 or 5.1, both of which have now End of Life and not supported. I am closing out as wontfix to clear from backlog. 

Please re-open if you disagree and wish further review.

Cliff