|Summary:||Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Marcin Łabanowski <marcin>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||besser82, fedora-package-review, gwync, itamar, notting, tcallawa|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-10-29 14:03:43 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Marcin Łabanowski 2008-06-21 19:46:38 UTC
Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netris.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netris-0.52-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Netris is a curses-based Tetris clone. It has single player and internet game (2 player) modes. You can also play against a bot. I need a sponsor, because it is my first package.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-21 20:33:11 UTC
My understanding is that we can't package Teris clones, especially if we actually go so far as to call them "Tetris clones". Asking the legal folks for advice.
Comment 2 Marcin Łabanowski 2008-06-21 20:46:08 UTC
As far as I know, there is a company, which holds "Tetris" trademark, but they do not own anything else (like patents, look and feel...). Because of that, upstream describes this game "version of T*tris", anyway, this is only description, so I thought it wouldn't make any problems. Also, there are some clones already packaged, like ksirtet from kdegames3. Anyway, thank you for help. I know there are some rules here.
Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-07-01 15:45:23 UTC
The clone is not the problem, the trademark is. The name of the game cannot use the registered "Tetris" trademark, or anything similar to it. "Netris" is far too similar to "Tetris", as would be "T*tris" or anything which rhymes with "Tetris". As is, this package is not acceptable for Fedora, however you can make it acceptable by renaming the game so that it does not violate the trademark, and minimizing the use of the "Tetris" mark to nominative use (basically, you can say that "$FOO is a puzzle game similar to Tetris (tm)"). You cannot call it a "Tetris clone". You could rename the game to something like NetFallingBlocks, NetBlockPuzzle, or anything else really, as long as it doesn't infringe upon the "Tetris" mark. You would need to be sure that the rename occurs in all user visible places (anything a user might be able to see while playing the game). You would not need to rename internal functions or the actual binary executable. The RPM name would need to change. If you have questions, please let me know.
Comment 4 Marcin Łabanowski 2008-07-01 18:32:33 UTC
Thank you for reply. I have chosen "netblocks" as the new name. At the moment I'm patching documentation. Do I have to include some copyright information about Tetris if I say "similar to Tetris (tm)"?
Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2008-07-01 18:41:38 UTC
Have you perhaps seen http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/netblocks ?
Comment 6 Marcin Łabanowski 2008-07-01 18:53:19 UTC
I saw that, but there weren't any releases. I looked at their SVN and it was empty. Now, after a longer investigation I have found http://games.court-empty. Now, after a longer investigation I have found http://games.court-jus.net/netblocks#attachments . It seems like I need to find another name.
Comment 7 Marcin Łabanowski 2008-07-01 19:55:27 UTC
Finally, I think everything in docs and software is renamed. Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-4.fc9.src.rpm
Comment 8 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-09-03 15:19:38 UTC
Lifting FE-Legal, there is no longer a trademark issue here.
Comment 9 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-10-14 19:50:03 UTC
rpmlint clean. Drop the explicit ncurses Requires, rpm will do it automatically. Despite being a console app, this could benefit from a .desktop file, see bombardier. netblox -R mentions the Forbidden Proper Noun. Probably should be patched to be more general, but it's your call, as Spot did indeed lift the Legal flag. Spot is still free to correct me on this, however. Mock build fails. Patch #7 (netris-0.52-pysiak1.diff): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/netris-0.52-pysiak1.diff + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0 4 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file game.c.rej 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file inet.c.rej RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rqp5dT (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rqp5dT (%prep) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/netblox.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 316, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/netblox.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED You should either re-diff the patch, or put this at the beginning of the spec as a temporary workaround: %define _default_patch_fuzz 2 Honestly, re-diffing would be better. Once fixed, mock builds are fine, no BuildRequire issues. Other than the Requires and patch fuzz issue, there are really no blockers after a full review. Since I see you need a sponsor, please do a few practice reviews and post links here. Once that's done satisfactorily, I'd be willing to sponsor you.
Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-03-31 13:21:24 UTC
Comment 11 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-06 13:43:17 UTC
Whoops, I'm sorry, I had misconfigured my gmail filters, so I didn't receive notification about your message. The patch was rejected due to the earlier rpm behaviour and guidelines, that allowed fuzzy patches. I'm going to release updated package later today.
Comment 12 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-06 13:57:11 UTC
Sounds good. Thanks!
Comment 13 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-06 15:42:27 UTC
Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-6.fc10.src.rpm BTW. my rename patch renames T*tris to Tetris(tm) in order for it to look better. Spot said above, that the package can't be "Tetris" or "Tetris clone", but it can be "similar to Tetris".
Comment 14 Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 15:49:38 UTC
If you're going to do this, don't use (R) or (TM). Instead, have a line that says: "Tetris is a registered trademark of The Tetris Company."
Comment 15 Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 15:50:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #14) > If you're going to do this, don't use (R) or (TM). I know this is slightly different from what I said back in 2008, but Red Hat Legal has adjusted their advice about the use of trademark symbols since then.
Comment 16 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-08 17:13:22 UTC
I've addressed these issues in the new release. Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-7.fc10.src.rpm
Comment 17 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-08 17:39:53 UTC
Looks better, only two things. 1. Drop the explicit ncurses Requires. 2. I don't see the icon in my menus. Is it placed properly? Since you're this close, it's probably a good time to start those practice reviews.
Comment 18 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-08 18:41:27 UTC
My first practice review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 The icon is in compressed SVG format and your desktop environment might not support it (I'm using only KDE, that's why I didn't spot this), so I'm going to rasterize it in the next release.
Comment 19 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-08 18:49:23 UTC
I'm using GNOME, but it's best to use something as many as possible can use. PNG would probably be best.
Comment 20 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-08 19:08:22 UTC
See comments on 494171.
Comment 21 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-08 19:09:35 UTC
Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-8.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Drop explicit ncurses requirement - Rasterize icon
Comment 22 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-08 19:34:12 UTC
Much better. Just a couple more practice reviews and we're on our way.
Comment 23 Marcin Łabanowski 2009-04-08 20:31:38 UTC
OK, my next review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728
Comment 24 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-09 13:33:01 UTC
See comments on 489728.
Comment 25 Gwyn Ciesla 2010-04-29 19:58:37 UTC
Comment 26 Gwyn Ciesla 2010-10-29 14:03:43 UTC
Closing, non-responsive submitter. Please re-open if still interested.