Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 451989

Summary: MAKEDEV should require glibc-common package
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: petrosyan
Component: MAKEDEVAssignee: Chris Lumens <clumens>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 3.23-5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-18 15:14:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description petrosyan 2008-06-18 14:55:35 UTC
Description of problem:
MAKEDEV uses 'getent' command in its %pre scripts:

%pre
# Add the floppy group and the vcsa user.
getent group floppy >/dev/null || groupadd -g 19 -r floppy
getent passwd vcsa >/dev/null || \
useradd -r -d /dev -s /sbin/nologin -u 69 \
    -c "virtual console memory owner" vcsa
exit 0
%--------------------

'getent' command is provided by glibc-common package but MAKEDEV does not
require it. This creates installation errors when doing a minimal Fedora install:

%packages --nobase
%end

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
MAKEDEV-3.23-4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. do a minimal Fedora install
%packages --nobase
%end
2. look at install.log

Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2008-06-18 15:14:17 UTC
Jesse rebuilt the other day to make sure we require /usr/bin/getent, so this
should be fixed in 3.23-5.

Comment 2 petrosyan 2008-07-30 13:50:49 UTC
when will MAKEDEV-3.23-5 get built for rawhide?

Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2008-07-30 14:06:40 UTC
Weird, the spec file got updated but it never got rebuilt.  I'm taking care of
that right now.  Thanks for alerting me.