|Summary:||Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Vivek Lakshmanan <viveklak>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, hdegoede, notting, rafaels|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-06-26 01:06:18 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 22:18:25 UTC
Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx-3.1.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Woodstox is a high-performance validating namespace-aware StAX-compliant (JSR-173) Open Source XML-processor written in Java. XML processor means that it handles both input (== parsing) and output (== writing, serialization)), as well as supporting tasks such as validation. Needed for supporting application servers
Comment 1 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-14 00:29:47 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227121 ***
Comment 2 Vivek Lakshmanan 2008-02-27 00:29:49 UTC
*** Bug 227121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2008-03-01 18:57:14 UTC
Hmm, When I suggested in Bug 227121 to mark it as a duplicate of this and to reopen this, and that I then would review this, I was kind of hoping that I would only be reviewing it, as I'm not mighty familiar with java. The only reason I'm interested in wstx, is because it beats the stax implementation shipped by default with icedtea by a factor of 10 when it comes to speed, making the loading of freecol (a game written in java I maintain) about 10 times faster. So perhaps a co-maintainership is the best solution, I can take either role (submitter or reviewer) now, and then later we maintain this together?
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-26 01:06:18 UTC
Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened, might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself?
Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2008-06-26 06:51:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #4) > Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened, > might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself? I would love to but currently I'm investing all my time into: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterWebcamSupport So maybe sometime in the future.