|Summary:||ricci uninstallable on ppc|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite||Reporter:||Nate Straz <nstraz>|
|Component:||conga||Assignee:||Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Corey Marthaler <cmarthal>|
|Version:||4||CC:||cfeist, cluster-maint, kanderso, kupcevic, rmccabe|
|Fixed In Version:||4.5||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-08-09 22:30:12 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Nate Straz 2007-04-17 20:33:35 UTC
Description of problem: I was trying to install everything in the cluster tarball from cfeist and I hit the following error: Unresolvable chain of dependencies: ricci 0.9.1-6 requires libmagic.so.1()(64bit) It appears that ricci is 64 bit but libmagic (from the file rpm) is not. I think this means that customers will not be able to use Conga to configure ppc nodes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. install base RHEL on ppc64 2. up2date --installall=cluster Actual results: See Above Expected results: ricci should install. Additional info:
Comment 3 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-04-24 15:19:52 UTC
Need this in 4.5 release. QE has machines to use for figuring the problem out. Nate will provide machine name.
Comment 5 Ryan McCabe 2007-04-24 20:58:56 UTC
I think this is a bug in the dependency resolver (or something in that area): [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libmagic.so.1" file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libmagic.so.1()(64bit)" [root@kent ~]# Other 64-bit libraries that ricci needs are accounted for correctly e.g., [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libcrypto.so.4()(64bit)" openssl-0.9.7a-43.16.ppc64 If I manually install the ppc64 "file" package (file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc64.rpm), I'm able to run up2date successfully, and I get this output from rpm: [root@newport SPECS]# rpm -q --provides file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc64 libmagic.so.1()(64bit) file = 4.10-3.EL4.5 Is there someone around who's more familiar with the build system who might know how to go about getting this fixed?
Comment 6 Ryan McCabe 2007-04-30 18:42:57 UTC
Closing as NOTABUG--we're going to build 32-bit. 64-bit packages aren't supported.
Comment 7 Nate Straz 2007-04-30 19:54:25 UTC
It's still a bug that we don't have ppc packages that install. We need to be able track that this problem is fixed. I don't see how this could possibly be NOTABUG.
Comment 8 Ryan McCabe 2007-05-02 01:16:18 UTC
In the 0.9.1-8 build, the ppc64 arch is excluded. This should adequately work around the problem, provided that the right bits make it to RHN.