Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 235370

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David Hollis <dhollis>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: chris.stone, tibbs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-11 01:35:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description David Hollis 2007-04-05 14:11:01 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: This package provides a PostgreSQL driver for the MDB2 database abstraction library.

This is my first submitted package so I am seeking a sponsor.

Comment 1 Christopher Stone 2007-04-06 18:32:32 UTC
I can sponser you, however I prefer users who can log into #fedora-devel on IRC
for easier communication.  You can start by reviewing some packages, for example:

Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2007-05-06 18:26:16 UTC
Anything happening here?  David, do you have other packages up for review that
we could look at?  The issue is that folks need some way to guage your
understanding of the packaging guidelines before you are given the power to
commit things into Fedora CVS.  Anything you can do to make that decision easier
is appreciated.

Comment 3 David Hollis 2007-05-10 21:27:18 UTC
I have a few other PEAR packages that I can give the once over and post for
review as well if it will help.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2007-05-10 21:47:54 UTC
Yes, if you have other things you'd like to get included, please go ahead and
submit them.  It makes it much easier for us if we have several things to go
over, even though packaging PEAR modules is mostly mechanical.

Comment 5 Christopher Stone 2007-07-03 04:10:57 UTC
I am no longer interested in sponsoring this person...

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2007-07-03 04:27:28 UTC
Yes, it's been over six weeks and as far as I can tell there's been no progress
here and no other tickets filed or commented on.

Setting needinfo for one final week; after that I'll close this ticket out.

Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2007-07-11 01:35:32 UTC
It's been a week; closing.