|Summary:||does not allow creation of qemu/kvm guests|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jeremy Katz <katzj>|
|Component:||virt-manager||Assignee:||Daniel Berrange <berrange>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Brian Brock <bbrock>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||abartlet, dennis, mike.reeves, mishu, peter, redhat-bugzilla, uwe, xen-maint|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-04-18 23:53:44 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Jeremy Katz 2007-03-23 15:43:39 UTC
qemu/kvm guests aren't allowed to be created in virt-manager since it's checking if the box is HVM capable. But that check is Xen-centric.
Comment 1 Mike Reeves 2007-03-24 13:33:53 UTC
Running core 7 test 2 "Linux swamp-vmm 2.6.20-1.3017.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 23:00:37 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux" I cannot build qemu or kvm machines. I bring up the virtualization manager and KVM is not even in the list so I select "qemu". I put in the server name and move to the next panel which asks about the machine architecture. I select x686 or x86_64 and it puts up the following message: "Hardware Support Required" with a description of "Your hardware does not appear to support full virtualization.Only paravirtualized guests will be available on this hardware." I am running a Pentium D 930 which does support Intel VT. If I boot the Xen kernel I can successfully create a fully virtualized guest (Fedora Core 6).
Comment 2 Mike Reeves 2007-03-27 22:03:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > qemu/kvm guests aren't allowed to be created in virt-manager since it's checking > if the box is HVM capable. But that check is Xen-centric. I am not sure that I understand your response. Are you saying that a pentium D 930 is not Intel VT? That is certainly not correct. Is it not supposed to be doing that check for KVM? Or are you saying that the HVM check is "Xen" centric. I can create a fully virtualized guest in Xen.
Comment 3 Peter Gordon 2007-03-27 22:22:38 UTC
I just tried this on my Development install (updated as of last weekend) and it works fine (allows the "Hardware acceleration" box to be checked/unchecked) if you have the kvm and kvm-intel (or kvm-amd as appropriate) kernel modules loaded and are installing to a supported guest (for example, KVM-acceleration of a x86 box on an x86_64 install would work, but virtualizing a PPC architecture would have to be done in software).
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2007-03-28 18:49:22 UTC
Created attachment 151146 [details] quick fix A better fix would be to use the libvirt capabilities stuff, but this is a quick fix to get things working again
Comment 5 Mike Reeves 2007-03-29 02:45:11 UTC
Jeremy - thx that got me past the issue. Kind of tired so i will try to put up the guest tomorrow. Peter - thx for the input. I am running the latest 1.3023 kernel in x86_64 mode (updated day before yesterday) and from the virt mgr I selected x86_64 and x686 both yielding the same results. My processor is Intel VT capable (Pentium D 930).
Comment 6 Mike Reeves 2007-03-29 18:53:22 UTC
This made it through the creation of the disk for the guest but finish the install I received the following error in a dialog box: Guest Install Error ERROR: virDomainCreateLinux() failed internal error No <source> 'dev' attribute specified with <interface type='bridge'/>
Comment 7 Mike Reeves 2007-04-10 01:39:26 UTC
Unfortunately this fix only corrected the initial problem and now the source that I have downloaded is backlevel and the new source does not appear to be downloadable yet. Consequently I tried to use the native qemu from the command line and I get the following notation when I start an install: "[root@swamp-vmm vm]# qemu -hda /vm/swampsol1.img -cdrom /dev/cdrom -boot d -kernel-kqemu -m 768 Could not open '/dev/kqemu' - QEMU acceleration layer not activated" The install for solaris does not work well and I cannot get fc7 to work at all from the command line. I will be unavailable from the 11th through the 24th but I would be happy to test whatever is available upon my return.
Comment 8 Andrew Bartlett 2007-04-10 07:28:33 UTC
This appears to be the same as what this patch went in to fix: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-cvs-commits/2007-February/msg01305.html However the patch has been backed out, I presume while upgrading to the latest release.
Comment 9 Uwe Kubosch 2007-04-13 13:31:55 UTC
I am having the same problem as described in comment #6 Is there a solution for this?
Comment 10 Jeremy Katz 2007-04-18 23:53:44 UTC