|Summary:||utrace: wait does not report immediately after PTRACE_ATTACH of process already in job control stop|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5||Reporter:||Roland McGrath <roland>|
|Component:||kernel||Assignee:||Roland McGrath <roland>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Martin Jenner <mjenner>|
|Version:||5.0||CC:||cagney, cmoller, mjw, seppo|
|Fixed In Version:||RHBA-2007-0959||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-11-07 19:45:10 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:||232837|
Description Roland McGrath 2007-03-23 00:49:44 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #232837 +++ The frysk test suite now has a good regression test for this issue, which I've fixed in the Fedora kernel. The behavior is a regression from RHEL4 and all prior kernels.
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-03-23 01:06:08 UTC
This bugzilla has Keywords: Regression. Since no regressions are allowed between releases, it is also being proposed as a blocker for this release. Please resolve ASAP.
Comment 4 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-06-20 12:31:34 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Kernel Team for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release, and has moved to bugzilla status POST.
Comment 5 Don Zickus 2007-07-19 20:06:35 UTC
Comment 7 Mike Gahagan 2007-08-28 19:47:33 UTC
Which testcase should be used to verify this bug? This is the only difference I'm seeing in running the test suite that comes with frysk. Is the stopkills test case the one I should be looking at for this bug? [root@test183 tests]# diff out.2.6.18-* 18c18 < PASS: frysk4330/stopkills --- > FAIL: frysk4330/stopkills [root@test183 tests]# echo diff out.2.6.18-* diff out.2.6.18-43.el5 out.2.6.18-8.el5 the failure mode according to strace is the ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH,...) call is failing with a -ESRCH (No such process), but I'm not sure if that applies here.
Comment 8 Mike Gahagan 2007-08-28 20:30:13 UTC
nevermind... looks like the testcase I mentioned in comment 7 is for bz235545 which is also fixed. :). I found the testcase in Bug #232837 and I can confirm it is fixed with the -43 kernel.
Comment 9 Jan Kratochvil 2007-09-23 22:48:48 UTC
*** Bug 289411 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 19:45:10 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html