Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

Bug 233523

Summary: libboost_python needs rebuild against python 2.5
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Component: boostAssignee: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mnewsome
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-29 19:16:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150226, 233782    
Attachments:
Description Flags
PATCH fixing boost compilation on x86_64 with python 2.5 none

Description Hans de Goede 2007-03-22 21:38:41 UTC
Hi,

I just tried to compile an application which uses libboost_python and that
failed because libboost_python expect the application to get linked against
/usr/lib/libpython2.4.so.1.0, but it is getting linked against
/usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0

So please rebuild boost ASAP (before Fedora 7 gets released) also since
libboost_python needs symbols from /usr/lib/libpython.so it should get linked
against it. If this had been done earlier then this breakage would have been
caught way earlier too, through rpm deps breaking.

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2007-03-24 10:16:52 UTC
Created attachment 150821 [details]
PATCH fixing boost compilation on x86_64 with python 2.5

I found this patch from opensuse, which fixes compiling boost on x86_64 with
python 2.5

Comment 2 Benjamin Kosnik 2007-03-27 17:37:21 UTC
Hey Hans. I rebuilt boost-1.33.1-12, it's too late for fc7t3 but will be in fc7.
This should show up on the rawhide build lists soon.

The build issue with linking libboost_python is on hold for the moment.

best,
benjamin

Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2007-03-27 19:03:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hey Hans. I rebuilt boost-1.33.1-12, it's too late for fc7t3 but will be in fc7.
> This should show up on the rawhide build lists soon.
> 
> The build issue with linking libboost_python is on hold for the moment.
> 

I don't understand, if you've build a new boost all is well. Or you mean the
fact that -lpython should be added to the libboost_python LDFLAGS/LIBS? If that
is what you mean I think thats best tracked in the review bug, and this one can
be closed.



Comment 4 Benjamin Kosnik 2007-03-28 10:06:33 UTC
> Or you mean the fact that -lpython should be added to the libboost_python 
> LDFLAGS/LIBS?

Yes, this. I added it to the review bug. When the rebuilt boost shows up, you
can close this if you are satisfied.

best,
benjamin

Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2007-03-29 19:03:50 UTC
I can confirm this is fixed, closing