|Summary:||add alee truetype fonts (Korean)|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||sangu <sangu.fedora>|
|Component:||i18n||Assignee:||Jens Petersen <petersen>|
|Status:||CLOSED DEFERRED||QA Contact:|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||eng-i18n-bugs, jko, petersen, smallvil, triage|
|Target Milestone:||---||Keywords:||FutureFeature, i18n|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Enhancement|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-07-08 06:03:11 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description sangu 2007-03-12 06:07:47 UTC
Description of problem: http://alee.qubit.name/fonts/alee/ All Korean users don't use baeckmuk fonts. Debian, gentoo, ubuntu provide alee font package for Korean users. See bug 112877 screenshot : http://kldp.org/files/ttf-alee-guseul-hanja.png Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: always
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2007-03-22 06:59:46 UTC
As a first step it would be great if you could contribute a package of alee to Fedora. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join for how to do that.
Comment 6 Jong Bae KO 2007-03-22 07:06:59 UTC
In my opinion, maybe we can include it, but we cannot use it in default font, because it is not formal style. I don't really like Baekmuk, but it is formal style.
Comment 7 Caius Chance 2007-03-22 08:16:55 UTC
Given that alee fonts are free to modify, redistributable. I support Jong Bae's suggesting to include it as non-default font.
Comment 8 Jens Petersen 2007-08-17 07:36:29 UTC
Dear Sangu, Would you or someone be willing to submit and maintain the font as a separate package in Fedora. Assuming there are no problems with license it would be great to have it included in Fedora.
Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2008-04-03 23:39:45 UTC
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2008-07-08 06:03:11 UTC
If you can submit a package for review I would be happy to check and review it. Thanks.
Comment 11 Dennis Jang 2008-07-08 09:10:21 UTC
(In reply to comment #10) > If you can submit a package for review I would be happy to check and review it. > Thanks. If sangu is can't packaging I 'll be a alee-fonts packaging for review
Comment 12 Jens Petersen 2008-07-14 07:42:49 UTC
That would be great, Dennis.